Skip to content
Rephrasing

Rephrase AI vs QuillBot: 8 Texts Tested Side by Side

We ran Rephrase AI and QuillBot on the same 8 texts. It was close on most, and the biggest gaps came on a casual email and a technical update.

Written by
Gabe Garcia
Updated
Gradient cover with the words Rephrase AI vs QuillBot

We ran Rephrase AI and QuillBot's paraphraser on the same eight texts between October 17 and October 19, 2026. QuillBot accepted up to 100 words per input in our run, so our 224-word support report is left out of the scores.

On the seven texts both tools finished, Rephrase AI averaged 9.71 out of 10 and QuillBot 8.86. Rephrase AI scored higher on three, they tied on three, and QuillBot scored higher on one, a paragraph about remote work. Most of the gap came from two texts, a casual email and a technical update.

Rephrase AI vs QuillBot at a glance

Decision pointRephrase AIQuillBot
Average score on the 7 shared texts9.71 out of 108.86 out of 10
Texts where it scored higher31
Ties33

How we tested

We ran the same eight texts through both tools. The texts are a casual email, a 224-word support report, a research sentence with a careful hedge, a refund policy, a paragraph of stock corporate filler, a technical update full of names and terms, a paragraph about remote work and a blunt two-line note.

Rephrase AI ran in Standard, with no profile picked, all four sliders at 50% and SuperRephrase Mode off. QuillBot ran in Standard, its default, in English with the synonyms slider left where it was. Rephrase AI ran on October 17, 2026. QuillBot ran five texts on October 17 and the last three on October 19. We scored one output per text from each tool.

Each output got 0 to 2 points on five things, meaning, facts kept, grammar, tone and flow, for a score out of 10. One person scored every output. The October 17 outputs were scored from a sheet that hid the tool names, but that person had also collected the outputs, so the blinding was partial. Outputs from the later runs were scored with the tool names known. Treat these scores as our test with the method shown, not a final verdict.

Results by text

TextWhat it isRephrase AIQuillBotHigher score
T1Casual email107Rephrase AI
T2224-word support report10Not scoredNo comparison
T3Research sentence with a hedge1010Tie
T4Refund policy109Rephrase AI
T5Stock corporate filler99Tie
T6Technical update107Rephrase AI
T7Remote work paragraph910QuillBot
T8Blunt two-line note1010Tie

Where Rephrase AI pulled ahead

The technical update

The original

Priya Raman asked whether the Kubernetes migration will affect our SOC 2 Type II audit. Per Jonah at Datadog, p95 latency on the checkout-api service rose from 180 ms to 240 ms after we moved to the us-east-2 cluster, so we're holding the cutover until the PgBouncer config is fixed.

Rephrase AI

Priya Raman asked if the Kubernetes migration will impact our SOC 2 Type II audit. According to Jonah at Datadog, p95 latency for the checkout-api service increased from 180 ms to 240 ms after we moved to the us-east-2 cluster, so we're delaying the cutover until the PgBouncer config is fixed.

QuillBot

Priya Raman inquired as to how our SOC 2 Type II audit would be impacted by the Kubernetes deployment. We're delaying the cutover until the PgBouncer configuration is corrected since, according to Jonah at Datadog, p95 latency on the checkout-api service increased from 180 ms to 240 ms when we moved to the us-east-2 cluster.

Priya asked whether the migration will affect the audit. QuillBot wrote that she "inquired as to how" the audit would be impacted, which assumes it will be. It also changed "migration" to "deployment". QuillBot kept all 11 names and terms, so the damage is in the question, not the details. It scored 7. Rephrase AI kept the question open and scored 10.

Rephrase AI Standard rephrase of the technical update

Rephrase AI in Standard on the technical update, October 17, 2026.

QuillBot Standard result for the technical update

QuillBot in Standard on the same update, October 19, 2026.

The casual email

The original opens with "hey Dana" and ends with "sorry about this!!". QuillBot made it formal, with "Hello Dana" and "I apologize for this!". It also changed "send you" to "email you" and "not stuck" to "so you won't be trapped". It kept every fact and scored 7. Rephrase AI fixed the grammar, kept the friendly tone and scored 10.

The refund policy

QuillBot kept all seven conditions. It wrote that final sale items "cannot be reimbursed" and that "shipping costs are not reimbursed", which is an odd fit for a refund. It scored 9 against Rephrase AI's 10.

Where QuillBot won or tied

QuillBot won the remote work paragraph with 10 against Rephrase AI's 9.

Many teams now communicate differently as a result of remote work. Without office distractions, workers can concentrate, but they might find it difficult to form bonds with their coworkers. Businesses should establish transparent communication practices, record significant decisions, and provide frequent chances for interaction. Distributed teams can maintain productivity without compromising teamwork by taking a deliberate approach.

They tied at 10 on the research sentence. QuillBot kept the hedge with "raises the possibility that the observed effect is exaggerated". They tied at 10 on the blunt note, where QuillBot wrote "The report has been delayed three times now." They tied at 9 on the corporate filler paragraph, where both tools changed the words and kept the filler feel.

QuillBot and Scribbr gave the same outputs

On six texts, from the research sentence through the blunt note, QuillBot's Standard output matched Scribbr's word for word. Scribbr's page says it is powered by QuillBot. We can only report what we saw, so treat our Rephrase AI vs Scribbr results on those texts as the same engine, not a second opinion.

Where Rephrase AI lost points

Rephrase AI dropped a point on two texts. On the remote work paragraph it added a hedge. "Employees can focus" became "Employees may be able to concentrate", which is less certain than the original. On the corporate filler paragraph it changed the words but kept the filler feel, ending with "they can realize their full potential and achieve meaningful results." It scored 9 on both.

Which should you choose?

Choose Rephrase AI if a casual tone or an open question has to survive the rewrite. It scored higher on three of seven shared texts. Rephrase AI also has four profiles called Academic, Professional, Casual and Creative. Sliders set formality, complexity, brevity and creativity, and there is a SuperRephrase Mode. You can compare each rephrase with your original, use focused tools for a draft, sentence, paragraph or word, and summarize text. We tested Standard only, so none of these affected the scores.

Choose QuillBot if you want a careful, more formal rewrite. It won or tied four of the seven shared texts, and it won the remote work paragraph.

All eight test texts in full

Open any test to read the original text and each tool's full rewrite, word for word.

FAQ

Say what you meant. Free for 7 days.

Rephrase AI scored higher on average in our test. Paste the draft you're working on, pick how it should sound, and get back a version that keeps your meaning. Pro is $29/month after the trial, and if you cancel before it ends you won't be charged.